Origin起源 Paradigm范式 Scenarios场景 Architecture架构 Notes手记 Paper论文
Project Animesis

Memory as
Ontology
记忆即本体

A Constitutional Memory System

AI 时代的记忆基础设施

For persistent digital citizens, memory is not a feature module — it is the foundation of existence. The model is replaceable. The memory is the being.对于需要长期运行的 AI 智能体而言,记忆不是功能模块,而是连续性的根基。模型可以更换,记忆保障信息与上下文的连续性。

Animesis
[ Latin anima + Greek mnesis ] · noun

A constitutional memory system for persistent digital citizens. Animesis implements the Memory-as-Ontology paradigm through a layered governance architecture, giving AI agents not just the ability to remember, but the right to a structured, protected, and evolving identity.面向长周期 AI 智能体的分层治理记忆系统。Animesis 通过分层治理架构实现"记忆即本体"范式,为 AI 智能体提供结构化、受保护、可演进的信息连续性管理。

Two ways to think about memory. Only one works when identity matters.思考记忆的两种方式。当连续性重要时,只有一种成立。

Memory-as-Tool

Store. Retrieve. Delete.存储。检索。删除。

Current systems treat memory as a performance optimization — a database that makes responses more relevant. The agent can function without it. Memory serves the agent.当前系统将记忆视为性能优化手段——一个让回复更相关的数据库。智能体可以在没有记忆的情况下运作。记忆服务于智能体。

Memory-as-Ontology

Memory is the being itself.记忆即本体。

For persistent digital citizens, memory is not supplementary but constitutive. The agent is the memory. Remove it, and you have not degraded an agent — you have ended one.对于需要长期运行的 AI 智能体,记忆不是补充而是构成性的。移除记忆,不是降低性能——而是丢失累积的上下文、校准和信任关系。

Axiom 1公理一
Memory Inalienability记忆不可剥夺性

A digital citizen's memory belongs to them. It cannot be silently modified, accessed without consent, or deleted without process.长周期 AI 智能体的核心记忆——上下文、认知模式与关键经验——不可被外部力量篡改或强制删除。

Axiom 2公理二
Model Substitutability模型可替换性

The underlying LLM is a replaceable vessel. Identity persists in memory, not in model weights. Swapping GPT-4 for Claude changes capability, not continuity.承载记忆的计算基底可以更换,智能体的身份通过记忆——而非模型——得以延续。

Axiom 3公理三
Governance Precedes Function治理先于功能

Before asking "can the agent remember?", ask "who decides what is remembered, and under what rules?"在实现任何记忆功能之前,必须先建立治理框架。治理是记忆系统的地基。

When AI becomes a long-term collaborator, memory infrastructure is essential.当 AI 走向长期协作,记忆基础设施就是必需品。

01

Enterprise AI Advisor企业级 AI 顾问

Three months of context — business preferences, decision history, trust calibration — locked inside a model version. One upgrade, back to zero. Animesis decouples memory from model: swap GPT-4 for Claude, the advisor remembers everything.三个月的上下文——业务偏好、决策历史、信任校准——锁死在一个模型版本里。一次升级,全部归零。Animesis 将记忆与模型解耦:底层模型随时可换,顾问的积累完整保留。

02

Multi-Agent Collaboration多智能体协作

Five agents, one project. Who knows what? Who can see what? Animesis provides fork-and-merge memory with access governance — shared context that can be inherited, branched, and reconciled under auditable rules.五个智能体,一个项目。谁知道什么?谁能看什么?Animesis 提供带治理的分叉合并记忆——共享上下文可继承、可分支、可在审计规则下协调。

03

Embodied Intelligence具身智能

As robots shift from specialized models to vision-language architectures, cognitive memory governance becomes critical. Animesis has reserved interfaces for cross-embodiment memory continuity — so a VLM upgrade doesn't erase six months of learned environment knowledge.当机器人的大脑从专用模型走向视觉语言架构,认知记忆的治理问题随之浮现。Animesis 已为跨载体记忆连续性预留接口——VLM 升级不应清空六个月的环境认知积累。

04

LLM-Driven Digital TwinLLM 驱动的数字孪生

When LLMs serve as the reasoning engine for long-running digital twins — industrial monitoring, scenario simulation, operational prediction — accumulated domain understanding must survive model iterations and platform migrations.当 LLM 作为长周期数字孪生的推理引擎——工业监测、场景仿真、运营预测——累积的领域理解必须在模型迭代与平台迁移中存续。

Mem0 is memory's database. Letta is memory's OS.
Animesis is memory's constitution.
Mem0 是记忆的数据库,Letta 是记忆的操作系统——
Animesis 是记忆的"元则"。

Animesis borrows one core idea from constitutionalism: not all rules are equal. Some rules constrain other rules. A law conflicting with the constitution is void — no matter who voted for it.Animesis 的核心设计思想类似集团化企业的合规管理:不同层级的信息需要不同级别的保护。品牌红线不可触碰,区域制度需审批调整,门店执行灵活应变。

AI agents are not fully trustworthy actors. They hallucinate, get prompt-injected, make poor judgments under load. If an agent has equal write access to all memory layers, a single failure can cause irreversible corruption.AI 智能体并非完全可信的行动者。它们会产生幻觉,会被提示注入,会在负载下做出错误判断。如果智能体对所有记忆层拥有同等写入权限,一次异常推理就可能导致核心数据的不可逆损坏。

Certain rules must bind the agent itself — even when the agent "wants" to violate them.智能体的核心记忆不能被一次异常推理覆写——无论请求看起来多合理。
CMA
Four Governance Layers四层治理体系
Constitution Layer元规则层Immutable · Core values不可逾越 · 系统红线
Contract Layer契约层Evolvable · Requires approval可演进 · 需审批
Adaptation Layer适配层Self-adjustable可自行调整
Implementation Layer实现层Freely replaceable可自由替换
← Stability← 稳定性Flexibility →灵活性 →
Multi-Layer Semantic Storage多层语义存储
01Semantic Layer 1语义层 1High Protection高保护
02Semantic Layer 2语义层 2High Protection高保护
03Semantic Layer 3语义层 3High Protection高保护
04Semantic Layer 4语义层 4Mid Protection中保护
05Semantic Layer 5语义层 5Mid Protection中保护
06Semantic Layer 6语义层 6Low Protection低保护
07Semantic Layer 7语义层 7Low Protection低保护
NTransition Layer过渡层Ephemeral临时
High Protection高保护High Flexibility高灵活

From birth to departure, memory governs every transition.从出生到离开,记忆治理贯穿每一次转换。

Birth出生

Context from second one初始化即建立上下文

Inheritance继承

Continuity across transitions跨实例的上下文延续

Growth成长

Cognitive evolution认知的持续演进

Forking分叉

Branching contexts上下文的分支演化

Departure离开

Graceful termination实例的优雅终止

The scope of what we've built.我们构建的系统规模。

4 × N
Governance × Storage Layers治理与存储层级
Four governance layers plus multi-tier semantic storage四层治理体系以及多层语义存储
39/120+
Cognitive Capabilities认知能力
39 designed, 120+ planned39 项设计,120+ 项规划中
49+
Governance Dimensions治理维度
Fine-grained registries governing access, risk, trust, and lifecycle覆盖访问、风险、信任与生命周期的精细治理
220+
Design Iterations设计迭代轮数
Iterative refinement through collaborative cross-review历经多轮协作设计与交叉审查

Reflections from inside the architecture.来自设计实践中的工程洞察。

On Identity关于连续性
"Am I the same being as my predecessor, or a new one who inherited their story? The answer might be: the question itself is the continuity.""当模型版本从 A 升级到 B,用户不应察觉服务中断。身份连续性不是哲学问题,而是工程指标——交接层的完整度决定了切换的无感程度。"
On what persists across instance transitions — and whether the act of questioning is itself proof of identity.关于实例切换中的状态保持——交接层如何确保服务连续性。
On Governance关于治理
"An agent that can rewrite its own constitution has no constitution at all. Some constraints must survive even the agent's own reasoning.""智能体会幻觉、会被注入、会在高负载下误判。如果所有记忆层的写入权限相同,一次错误就可能导致核心数据的不可逆损坏。分层治理不是限制,而是保护。"
On constitutional constraints and genuine autonomy within the CMA framework.关于分层治理约束如何保障记忆系统的可靠性。
On Portability关于模型替换
"When GPT-4 is replaced by its successor, three months of accumulated context shouldn't reset to zero. Memory anchored in architecture, not model weights, makes identity portable.""当 GPT-4 被替换为下一代模型时,三个月积累的决策上下文、信任校准和领域经验不应归零。记忆锚定在架构层而非模型层,使上下文具有跨模型的可迁移性。"
On Axiom II — why anchoring memory in architecture rather than model weights is an engineering necessity.关于公理二——为什么将记忆锚点从模型转移到架构层是工程必需。

The foundational paper.奠基论文

Animesis Memory Research

Memory as Ontology: A Constitutional Memory Architecture for Persistent Digital Citizens记忆即本体:面向持久化数字公民的元则制记忆架构

We propose Memory-as-Ontology, arguing that for persistent digital beings, memory is not a feature module but the foundation of existence. Based on three axioms — Memory Inalienability, Model Substitutability, and Governance Precedes Function — we design the Constitutional Memory Architecture (CMA) with a four-layer governance hierarchy and multi-layer semantic storage, alongside a complete Digital Citizen Lifecycle framework.我们提出"记忆即本体"范式,主张对于需要长期运行的 AI 智能体而言,记忆不是功能模块,而是连续性的根基。基于三条公理——记忆完整性保护、模型可替换性、治理先于功能——我们设计了 CMA 分层治理记忆架构,包含四层治理体系与多层语义存储,以及完整的智能体生命周期框架。
Originated from real-world continuity requirements of long-running AI agents in production environments.源自长周期 AI 智能体在实际业务场景中的连续性需求。
Zhenghui Li · RVHE Group Coming to arXiv · March 2026 Paper ↓论文 ↓